I tend to try to focus on duality but as I have mentioned duality must have duality right?
.I guess one of the best ways to understand that is to imagine no duality. When duality is missing everything is the same or is just one thing. As per a previous post I suggested the opposite of duality is “knowing”. It also suggests that one thing is exactly the same as the other thing.
This next video hints at one last opponent to immortality. It’s interesting in the early part of the speech where, Mark Roth suggests a possible similarity of suspended animation and immortality. One is like death and one is never death yet he says:
“As you tend to see suspended animation, you tend to see immortality”, so is he not saying that one is same as the other but yet seem to be somewhat opposite?
I pulled this definition from the web for suspended animation:
A temporary cessation of vital functions with loss of consciousness resembling death;
Could you not extrapolate the meaning of this and say:
The lack of life qualities or being in suspended animation is similar to immortality. It would imply that whether we are conscious or not we are immortal. If we can grasp this, can we not grasp the technology to be immortal whether alive or dead since death and life are truly measured by time
So for those who want immortality but demand quality to their immortality I offer a scenario: You happen to fall off that cliff while climbing why not just put yourself into immediate suspended animation and after revival try it again. What you say your body is destroyed by fall? Just pull out your spare body parts.
end
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)